Friday, September 19, 2008

TIMMY!!! GOES HOLLYWOOD!


(Guest Writer: TIMMY!!!)


On Tuesday, September 23 at 7:00 pm, "The Battles of Tim Eyman" will have its movie theatre debut at the Anacortes Cinemas in northwest Washington. The trailer for this documentary by producer Paul Fraser can be viewed here: http://timeyman.info/.


Tim will attend the debut and after the movie will hold a town hall meeting at the theatre, answering questions from the audience and discussing past, current, and future initiative and political efforts. Contact info for producer Paul Fraser: (206) 372-2155, deluxentertainment@yahoo.com


Contact info for Brent Johnson, who is securing other theatre venues: (360) 840-4827, brent@newalbion.org


Contact info for Anacortes Cinemas‎: 415 O Ave, Anacortes, WA - (360) 293-7000‎ Contact info for Washington's Own Schwarzenegger (watch the trailer): tim_eyman@comcast.net, cell: (509) 991-5295


What's not to love about this? Jack, Mike, and I have been doing this political stuff for 10 years. Thanks to our hardworking and loyal supporters, we've accomplished some extraordinary things and learned a lot about what works and what doesn't. But frankly, we feel like we've only recently been hitting our stride and that our most significant, game-changing achievements are ahead of us. Working together with our thousands of supporters throughout the state and with the support of the voters, there's no limit to what we can accomplish together.


When we decided that I-985 was the best vehicle to communicate our no-new-taxes/accountability message in 2008, we knew we had a winner. But we never expected our opponents to figure that out. They're in total disarray. They've raised a whopping $7100 from 3 donors ($5000 from the Sierra Club's Seattle chapter). Their campaign manager who announced in July that he was running things quit, then a new campaign manager was brought on board who was doing such a bad job that the original campaign manager came back. Yikes! Their website (www.no985.org) is put together by a teenager working out of his mom and dad's basement in Redmond as a high school extra credit project. No doubt their on-again-off-again amateur-hour 'leadership' explains why confidence in their operation is non-existent.


Will they get their act together eventually? Probably. But every dollar they spend opposing I-985 is money down a rat hole -- I-985 is just too popular. In these tough economic times, voters will not tolerate higher taxes. They instead demand that state and local governments spend the money they're already taking from us more effectively. That's exactly what I-985 does. Opponents' alternative plans FORCE THE TAXPAYERS to pay more.


I-985 FORCES THE POLITICIANS to spend more effectively the taxes we're already paying. I-985 is a well-thought-out, professional, comprehensive transportation reform proposal; it offers immediate, cost-effective solutions with built-in accountability and oversight by Washington's most trusted elected official. And rather than raising taxes, I-985 instead funds its common sense policies with transportation-related taxes and charges that we, the citizens, are already paying.


Jack, Mike, and I are extremely grateful for the folks who have contributed to our compensation fund. We ask that you continue that support. If you like and appreciate our past, current, and future efforts on behalf of taxpayers, please send us a donation for $10, $25, $50, $100, $250, $500, $1,000 or more (there are no limits on how much can be given). Please consider a monthly pledge from now through December for our fund. We ask you to please help us help taxpayers.


You can go to our website -- http://www.VotersWantMoreChoices.com -- and make a secure PayPal or VISA or MasterCard contribution . Your voluntary contribution to our compensation fund will be divided between the three of us and compensate us for our political work. Congratulations again on getting I-985 on the ballot - we look forward to working with all of you to get it approved by voters. As for our compensation fund, we would be extremely grateful for any financial assistance you can offer. Thanks.


Best Regards,


TIMMYYY!!!

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

PRICELESS!!!!

$28,500. for dinner

$2,500. to see Barbara Streisand Sing

$0.50 for earplugs

McCain's opponent showing his true Hollywood Elitist self...

PRICELESS!!!



Billary 2's excuses to not show support for Isreal...even better.

MCCAIN / PALIN 2008

WHY PROGRESSIVES HATE SARAH

G,G,G,Gloria the man hater is who the left idolizes.
It now appears that she is a lady hater, too.
Sarah is not shrill,
is not a harpy.
Sarah is comfortable in her own skin.
Sarah cannot be controlled by any woman,
or any man.
She will stand up to her own party as well as 'Jackass the Party'.
I suspect that she will even stand up to John McCain if she believes he is wrong.

Sarah is one of us folks from mainstreet America,
that the progressives look down upon as they fly from
New York to Hollywood.
Sarah is tough.
She is confident.
She has been a commercial fisherman.
She is a big game hunter.
She is who she is.
She is proud and not ashamed to be a Lady.

The elitists who want to tell us how we should think
are already buying into the bookbanning myths.
Please keep up the nastiness,
Keep up the attacks.
Bring up the shrill intensity.
It will slide right off her teflon coated skin.
It will show her for who she is...
...and the progressives for what they are.

The real reason the progressives hate her?
They know their good freinds are now telling us
conservatives that they are switching to McCain
because...




DUH...

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

YOU ARE NO RUFUS T. FIREFLY!!!

John McCain's upststart opponent
is no Rufus T. Firefly.
However it appears that his collective 'freedoms'
that he believes in from his socialist treatise, 'the audacity of dope'
may very well have been inspired by Rufus T. Firefly,
in my Favorite WAR movie of all time, DUCK SOUP.

You tell me there are no similarities...
go on I dare ya...

"These are the laws of my administration...
No one's allowed to smoke
Or tell a dirty joke
And whistling is forbidden...
If chewing gum is chewed
The chewer is pursued.
And in the hoosegow hidden...
If any form of pleasure is exhibited
Report to me and it will be prohibited.
I'll put my foot down, so shall it be.
This is the land of the free.

The last man nearly ruined this place
He didn't know what to do with it
If you think this country's bad off now
Just wait 'til I get through with it...
The country's taxes must be fixed
And I know what to do with it
If you think you're paying too much now
Just wait 'til I get through with it...
I will not stand for anything

that's crooked or unfair
I'm strictly on the up and up
So everyone beware
If anyone's caught taking graft
And I don't get my share
We stand 'em up against the wall
And pop goes the weasel.
If any man should come between

her husband and his bride
We find out which one she prefers
By letting her decide
If she prefers the other man
The husband steps outside
We stand 'em up against the wall
And pop goes the weasel."

-Rufus T. Firefly, policy song, Duck Soup.


by the way, did I say yet...

MCCAIN/ PALIN 2008!!!

Monday, September 15, 2008

IT'S A NO BRAINER! SARAH WINS AGAIN!!!

Round about Noon -thirty I met up with a couple of my buddies,
after a morning of political stuff.
We took off and had a great ride!
We covered several counties and finally came home via Chuckanut Drive.
What a view of Samish Bay!

Well along the way at one point I thought about what kind of leadership do we need with changing our energy policies?

We need some futuristic thinking,
and we need some practical solutions until we catch up with Asimovian, Heinleinian, and Clarkist solutions.

So, when I think about it...
...do we want to go backwards to the buggywhip and pedal pushing days of the 1800's while we wait for our best physicists to develop Fusion Reactors, Zero Point Energy, Wind, Tide, and Solar Farms in space beaming energy via lasers to earth?

Or do we want to drill in locations that there is actually oil?

Do we want to build the first Refinery since the Reagan Administration?

I think practical solutions far outweigh waiting for the future...

Do we want powerful independent solutions?

Or do we really prefer impotent solutions designed to take us back to the days of wood fired steam engines and pedal operated bicycles and whirligigs of fantasy...



What kind of change would you prefer?
Awesome Ferocious Practical Power?
or weaky squeaky pedaliwanks...?
MCCAIN / PALIN 2008!